Well... finally ranted (sort of) at an admin about the barrage of pr0n posing as DDs.
Ichijiku: Flogging a dead horse.
As the subject mentioned, this is likely just more flogging on an already dead horse, but I have to say something to justify my rants.
First, I'd like to establish that I consider nude photography/painting/whatever to be a perfectly valid art form. The human body is incredible, and should be appreciated, not hidden like something distasteful.
That having been said, I find my views on that changing, largely due to the amount of nude photography selected for daily devs. I won't debate quality, art is perception, and everyone sees things differently. But it seems like a truly disproportionate quantity of DD's come from this category.
So, I find myself in the position of being unable to appreciate the actual artistic nudes I run across, simply because I associate them with the number of nudes selected to be featured.
Yes, that's just a personal issue, but I certainly know I'm not alone in this.
I just feel it's unfair to the category, having the merit of the art based on the voyeuristic thrill, rather than the art itself.
Painting geese on a pond isn't daring, but more talent goes into making something like that good that what is required in asking your girlfriend to lie naked on a rock.
I make no claims to being great, or even a good artist, but that doesn't mean I'm incapable of enjoying, and disliking, various pieces of art.
Perhaps a little moderation?
Thank you for your time.
^firelite-photo: Re: Flogging a dead horse.
Sorry, but if deviantART met everyones demands, where would we be?
i already moderate as is...
Well, regardless of result, the response WAS prompt, and as the director of the nude photography galleries, he does actually select some good photos.
And I wasn't banned, which is an improvement over the
last time I made my opinions known to the admins or my RO site.
^_^;;;;


